The attacker isn't adding blocks to the end. He has to go back and redo the block his transaction is in and all the blocks after i
The attacker isn't adding blocks to the end. He has to go back and redo the block his transaction is in and all the blocks after it, as well as any new blocks the network keeps adding to the end while he's doing that. He's rewriting history. Once his branch is longer, it becomes the new valid one.
category:
source: email